Karl Kapp discussed the theory of cognitivism in his blog posting. I agree with Karl Kapp (2007) in regards to his statement
about cognitivism not explaining the entire process of how we process
information. The theory of cognitivism provides a foundation for understanding
and explaining how we process information. I do not believe that we will ever
be able to fully explain how the brain processes information. Each human being
is different as well as our thought processes and triggers. According to Kerr (2007), cognitivism has evolved and will continue to do so over time. I agree with this point because learners are exposed to more information than ever before and they are able to access information at a much faster pace. Due to the limitless information that technology offer learners, I believe that each learner processes the information they are exposed to differently.
Reference
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web
log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on
educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Hi Janel,
ReplyDeleteI agree that a learner processes information differently and thus learns differently. So information should be given different ways. So how do we modify the information to accommodate each type of learner so that we ensure learning? And will this take away from the learning process? What do you think?
JoAnn,
DeleteAs educators, we must deliver out content in a variety of ways that appeal to various learners. I don't believe that would take away from the learning process, it would enhance it. Would you agree?
Janel'
Hi Janel,
ReplyDeleteExposer is important such as discovery learning. Discovery learning associated with Jerome Bruner, learning occurs when the teacher organizes the class so students can learn by actively being involved.
Janel, I feel that cognitivism is performed better when it is regularly encounter or interests. There are some things that can process in our memories and last and others we have learned but forgot. We remember what we want to at times. For instance, traveling to a place I'm not familiar with. I tell others that I'd have to do it regularly (practice) to get to the destination. Nowadays, we can use GPS navigation, which we can't always depend on. Another example is reading the Bible, I can remember stories but I need to process more in my head where the story was told (book, chapter, and scripture verses).
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat post. I believe there must be a balance when considering the wealth of information and exposure. There are concrete operations enhanced with critical thinking lessons that are positive ways to introduce new skills. These learning theories are effective when we are flexible in our application (I think).
DeleteJanel'
ReplyDeleteI agree that learners process information differently. In fact, it is amazing to me how multiple people can hear the same message, yet derive totally different meaning from what was communicated. I believe that this is a perfect example of the significance of Piaget's Cognitive Theory, in which past experiences determine future knowledge.
John